Austin Oil and Gas Attorney Comments on Recent Texas Supreme Court Royalty Case

Law Firm Newswire
Attorney Press Releases and Legal News
http://www.lawfirmnewswire.com
Austin Oil and Gas Attorney Comments on Recent Texas
Supreme Court Royalty Case
Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) July 25, 2012 - The Texas Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Shell
v. Ross.
The ruling stated that an oil and gas company did not have to reimburse a royalty owner for incorrect payments,
because the statute of limitations had lapsed. The decision overturned a jury verdict of $72,000 in favor of the
royalty owner.
"This case is a wake-up call for all royalty owners," said Gregory D. Jordan, an Austin oil and gas attorney.
"Even though Ross was in the right, the court ruled that he waited too long to act even if he was allegedly misled
by the oil company. I hope that all royalty owners will pay attention to this significant case," noted Jordan.
Ralph Ross's family first entered into a lease with Shell Oil Company in 1961, which required that Shell pay
royalties on gas according to the "amount realized" by the company. However, from 1988 to 1994, the royalties
Shell paid were based on an average price, rather than the amount the company actually received. In addition,
from 1994 to 1997, the company paid royalties to Ross based on an internal figure that the company admitted it
could not explain. The company's sole defense was that the four-year-long statute of limitations had passed.
Ross filed suit against Shell in 2002, outside of Texas' four-year-long statute of limitations for contract claims.
The plaintiff sought to avoid the limitation through the fraudulent concealment doctrine, which provides in part,
that the statute of limitations is tolled if the defendant has misled the plaintiff. A jury agreed that Shell had
fraudulently concealed its underpayment of royalties and that Ross could not have discovered the underpayment
through reasonable diligence until 2002. In overruling the jury's decision, the Texas Supreme Court found that
Ross could have discovered the underpayment through readily accessible public records, and should not have
relied on a statement from Shell.
"Disputes over oil and gas royalty payments are common, and what this case shows is that royalty owners need
to be vigilant," said Jordan. "If a royalty owner has any question about the royalty payments he has been
receiving, that royalty owner should consult with a qualified oil and gas attorney at that time. Further, it might be
a good idea for royalty owners to have their royalty payments reviewed at least every three years to be sure that
they are accurate."
Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684
page 1 / 1
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

---