Retain information that this process is a very, very protracted process. You have just before transpire tolerant with the banks. Because moral about each bank is extremely frustrated. They are ...
GBI Research, the leading business intelligence provider, has released its latest report, “Biosimilars in Emerging Economies - Advanced Recombinant Technology Platforms and Low Cost ...
Coined in the mid 1970s by Dr. Michael B. Sporn, the
term chemoprevention is defined as the pharmacologic intervention
with a natural or synthetic compound to reverse
or suppress ...
Efficient video search software needs to deliver the content you need, irrespective of whether your device is a
computer or a mobile device. A searchable video like vsearch provides the ease of ...
Even though it is okay to receive training on how to operate a vehicle from a parent or a sibling who is 21 years old or older and has a full British driving license for at least 36 months, it is ...
Content Preview
BIM
–
just
another
buzzword
or
a
real
change
in
the
industry?
Prof.
Arto
Kiviniemi
Digital
Architectural
Design
10th
November
2010
Content of the presentation
?? What
is
BIM?
?? Some
key
points
in
the
history
of
BIM
?? Open
BIM
-?
Interoperability
and
IFC
?? Where
is
the
market
now?
?? Some
obstacles
and
problems
?? Some
potenNal
bene?ts
?? Requirements
&
examples
of
successful
deployment
?? Future
development
needs?
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
What is BIM?
?? Building
InformaNon
Modelling
is
the
process
of
generaNng
and
managing
building
data
during
its
life
cycle
(Wikipedia)
?? Building
InformaNon
Models
•? are
typically
produced
using
3-?dimensional,
dynamic
building
modeling
soVware
•? include
geometry,
properNes,
quanNNes,
spaNal
and
funcNonal
relaNonships
of
building
components,
and
possibly
geographical
informaNon
(GIS)
?? Integrated
BIM
•? consists
of
several
domain
models;
requirements,
architectural,
structural,
MEP,
producNon,
as-?built,
maintenance…
•? requires
interoperability
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Some key points in the history of BIM
?? Charles
Eastman:
“ The
use
of
computers
instead
of
drawings
in
building
design,”
Journal
of
the
American
InsNtute
of
Architects,
March
1975
?? Early
building
product
modelling
research
in
1980s
and
1990s
•? RATAS,
Combine
2,
ISO
STEP
•? According
to
Jerry
Laiserin
the
?rst
implementaNon
of
BIM
was
GraphisoV's
Virtual
Building
concept
in
1987.
?? Interoperability
-?
IAI/buildingSMART
•? Industry
Alliance
for
Interoperability
in
1994;
12
founding
members:
AT&T,
Archibus,
Autodesk,
Carrier,
HOK,
Honeywell,
Jaros
Baum
&
Bolles,
LBNL,
Primavera,
SoVdesk,
Timberline,
and
Tishman
•? InternaNonal
Alliance
for
Interoperability
in
1996;
7
founding
chapters:
French
Speaking,
German
Speaking,
Japan,
Nordic,
North
America,
Singapore
and
UK.
Later
new
chapters:
Australasia,
Benelux,
China,
Iberia,
Italia,
Korea,
Middle
East
•? New
name
“buildingSMART
InternaNonal”
in
2005
?? Term
BIM
launched
by
Phil
Bernstein
(Autodesk)
in
2002
?? GSA
and
Senate
ProperNes
started
to
demand
BIM
in
their
projects
in
2007
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Open
BIM
–
Interoperability
and
IFC
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
IFC is only a part of the solution
??IFC
is
only
an
enabling
speci?ca5on;
one
component
for
soVware
development
and
implementaNon
??SoluNon
components:
•? Enabling
technologies
Common ICT
•? ICT
infrastructure
development
•? Enabling
speci?caNons
IAI/IFC (+ others)
•? SoVware
applicaNons
Software industry
•? Processes
•? Business
models
AEC/FM industry
•? People
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Where are we on the Hype Cycle?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
BIM market transition
Expected
situaNon
in
5-?10
years
Current
market
situaNon
Early
Tornado
Main
stream
1990s
Early
market
Bowling
Chasm
alley
Market
saturaNon
Forerunners
Visionaries
PragmaNsts
ConservaNves
SkepNcs
(Innovators)
(Early
adopters)
(Early
majority)
(Late
majority)
(Laggards)
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Some
obstacles
and
problems
Slow adoption of integrated BIM
?? Fragmented
industry
–
no
strong
drivers
•? Large
number
of
shareholders
with
potenNally
con?icNng
interests
in
every
project
•? Ad-?hoc
project
partners
=
no
cumulaNve
learning,
lowest
common
denominator
de?nes
the
level
of
integraNon
•? Very
few
sponsors
for
common
development
•? “Great
idea.
Tell
me
when
it
is
ready.”
?? ImplementaNon
of
open
standards
(IFC)
has
been
slow
and
su?ered
from
inadequate
quality
•? Too
many
di?erent
versions
•? Some
disappoinNng
results
in
early
projects
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
17
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
General obstacles
?? Sub-?opNmizaNon
•? Typically
low
bid
in
every
task,
although
minimized
design
and
planning
e?ort
can
lead
into
signi?cant
addiNonal
costs
in
producNon
•? SeparaNon
of
design
and
producNon
knowledge
?? Legal
responsibiliNes
–
changes
may
increase
uncertainty
and
risks
?? In
general
change
adverse
aqtude
•? Known
exisNng
problems,
but
“Rather
the
devil
we
know.”
•? Nobody
wants
to
be
the
?rst;
“It
is
the
second
mouse
who
gets
the
cheese!”
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010 19
Changing business case
?? Required
investments
and
achieved
bene?ts
do
not
necessarily
a?ect
the
same
player
•? More
work
and
added-?value
in
the
early
phases
of
the
process,
direct
gains
mainly
in
later
phases
•? Who
wins,
who
loses,
or
should
we
re-?think
the
rewards?
–
Good
results
of
IPD
in
USA
?? No
real
process
owners
•? Systemic
innovaNons
–
changes
a?ecNng
several
actors
–
are
di?cult
to
implement
?? Most
clients
do
not
know
what
to
demand
and
how
to
control
the
new
processes
•? Missing
baseline
-?
di?cult
to
compare
o?ers
and
results
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010 20
BIM to become part of public procurement process
1 October 2010 | By Anna Winston
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/uk/bim-to-become-part-of-public-procurement-process/5006655.article
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Is this the industry response?
Or
should
we
think
why
clients
want
BIM?
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
PotenNal
bene?ts
26
27
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Requirements
&
examples
of
successful
deployment
Six steps to ”successful BIM”
30
Why to try to do everything in one go?
31
Why to start from the most complex one?
32
Top level support and strategy
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
BIM: five 0 in construction process
0-errors in design
0-errors in quantity- /cost estimations
and scheduling
0-errors in procurement and logistics
0-errors in production
0-errors in hand-over
Results in a better productivity!
34
4.11.2010
BIM applications in a Procurement Facilities Mgt.
typical sequence order
for implementation in Site BIM –
Production
Skanska Visualizations
Planning
Safety Planning
Intelligent
= level 1 Clash
3D-Modeling
Detection 4D-Scheduling
Simulations
= level 2 Energy, fire etc
= level 3
Supply Chain Quantity take-
Management off, Costing
LCC- and LCA-
analyses
BU’s have the option to work with
applications from a higher level
35
4.11.2010
Multidisciplinary model ?? Architectural model:
?? Partition walls
?? Windows
?? Doors
?? Balcony railings and
glazings
?? Surfaces
?? Etc.
?? Structural model
?? Foundations
?? External wal.ls
?? Load-bearing internal
walls
?? Stairs
?? Balcony slabs,
columns
?? Etc.
?? HVAC:
?? Pipes
?? Devices
?? Electrical model:
?? Devices
?? Cable racs
36
4.11.2010 Johan Stenstrand
Site and safety planning & BIM
Precast
panels
Safety
railings
Waste
Walking containers
way
Fencing Timber
storage
Site access
and roads
37
4.11.2010 Johan Stenstrand
Temporary structures
Formwork, Suports & Scaffolding
38
4.11.2010 Johan Stenstrand
Benefits of using BIM on site
Facilitates the development of the construction
Collaboration with subs sequence so that health and safety are taken
Able to do proper with model into account (best way to build in that sense)
production planning
Quick and accurate
quantities
Multi-disciplinary
information in one
place
Quicker problem solving
Model updated faster and
more often than drawings -
Production team do not rely on
drawings that could be out of
Information easily
date
available
Trust the model &
drawing -> gives
opportunity to speed up
production (design has
to be finalized because it
looks finalized in model
& in drawings
Problems in the design are
apparent
– no need to debate on that
Information flows all
the way to the doer
Less errors/Mistakes
Model based collaboration & made because of better
communication Total and faster understanding understanding
Support co-operation between design of what to be build
disciplines More precise, clear
39
4.11.2010 Johan Stenstrand
Example of integrated BIM simulation tools
Requirements’ Comfort simulation Energy simulation Investment and Environmental Multiphysics
management of spaces of building LCC analysis analysis (LCA) calculations
Self-reporting
Analysis building modelling building
Building information model (BIM)
FM and
building portals
BIM model auditing
Geometry model and
databases
Technical Lightning CFD simulation of
Building services Visualization of Virtual reality
visualizations simulations demanding spaces
Network BIM combined models
Copyright Granlund | January 2010 www.granlund.fi 40
Management of requirements and versions
Facilities Design Client
Management
Reporting
Client’s needs
Space data browsing, visualization by color charts 1. Space type requirements
6. System modeling •? Comparisons: to targets and between versions
•? Overall checking of design process
Comfort
Design data Lighting
Simulation results
System needs
2. Geometry model
5. Thermal simulation
Simulation results by Modeling tools
Geometry model or Architectural
Space data model
3. Validation of BIM
4. Space groups
Geometry
Space types Spaces
Zones Windows
Doors
Copyright Granlund | January 2010 www.granlund.fi 41
Comparison of different alternatives
Alternative simulation results compared in ROOMEX to support decision making and
project management
?? Various versions can be made for ex. by
simulating different window types
?? Differences between simulation results
will be presented with colour maps
?? Simulation results can also be
compared with original requirements
?? Comparable results are, for example:
- cooling loads
- heat losses
- air flow rates
- luminance rates
Copyright Granlund | January 2010 www.granlund.fi 42
BIM in technical facilities management
Information management Building information
of integrated design model (BIM) for design
Data publishing Archiving of
As-built data/
for FM Native models
Renovations
(MagiCAD,…)
Building information model (BIM) for FM
•? Building geometry / floor plans, spatial data Long Term Planning, Maintenance planning,
•? Technical FM database Energy management etc
Graphical user-interface of RYHTI FM
Maintenance
Technical services in spaces •? Locating equipment and zones.
•? Available electrical, telecom services •? Group replacement of lamps
IT services in spaces Service requests
•? LAN free/used connections, PC’s •? Locating spaces for need of service
Classification of spaces
Design targets of spaces •? Medical,…
•? Comfort, thermal loads •? Special requirements, inspections
Comparison
to targets Access
Measured comfort •? Permissions to different areas
•? Temperatures in reference spaces •? Maintenance personnel routes
Workplaces Contract areas
•? Personnel data, telephone catalogue •? Tenants, maintenance, cleaning,…
Copyright Granlund | January 2010 www.granlund.fi 43
Public statement by government clients of the AEC/FM sector
Statement
of
IntenNon
to
Support
Building
InformaNon
Modeling
with
Open
Standards:
?? ”We
will
support,
to
the
extent
legally
and
pracNcally
possible,
the
use
of
IFC-?related
BIM
soluNons
in
public
construcNon
works”
?? ”Our
intent
is
for
all
major
projects
to
use
open
BIMs
based
on
IFCs
on
a
regular
basis
but
no
later
than
within
a
two-?
to
four-?year
(i.e.,
2009-?2011)
Nmeframe”
?? ”We
also
intend
to
observe
and
assess
the
conNnuing
development
of
relevant
accompanying
open
BIM-?related
standards
like
IFD,
IDM
and
MVD
approach
to
describe
and
display
the
informaNon
required
for
the
design,
construcNon,
and
operaNon
of
constructed
faciliNes
and
the
interfacing
of
GIS-?related
open
standards”
Public statement by - U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), USA
- Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority (DECA), Denmark"
"- Senate Properties, Finland"
"- Directorate of Public Construction and Property (Statsbygg), Norway
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
BIM tests of Senate Properties 2001-2006
HAKA6
Lohipato school
All
Aurora 2
participants
used BIM HUT-600 Helsinki Music Centre
Tietotalo 2, Oulu TUT Administration
Upinniemi Central Warehouse
Torikatu 36, Oulu
As the result of testing
Didacticum Senate Properties
HU Animal Hospital
started to demand
VTT Digi Building
BIM in all projects starting
Only one since October 1st, 2007
Canthia
participant
used BIM
BIM used only in one BIM used in all
phase of the project phases of the project
How can BIM improve the decision making?
Senate Properties’ investment process
•? What information is needed for critical decisions?
•? Which parts of this information are already possible to
process with BIM better than in the traditional ways?
•? Market readiness; both technical and skill view points?
47
Senate Properties’ investment process
Mandatory use of BIM
1.10.2007
Optional use of BIM
Mandatory use of BIM
1.4.2009
Mandatory use of BIM
Creation of the
design models
Publication
of models
Use of models in analysis and simulations
Quality
checking
Scope, investment and lifecycle costs, sustainability
48
Senate Properties’ BIM requirements
2007 BIM guidelines available in English at
http://www.senaatti.fi/
49
Helsinki Music Centre
•? Integrated BIM used on site operations
•? No installations allowed before the
detailed, combined model is approved
Arto Kiviniemi - Professorial lecture 10/11/2010
Add New Comment