report

DRUG DISCRIMINATION IN RATS UNDER CONCURRENT VARIABLE-INTERVAL VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES

(0 votes cast)

Tags: drug discrimination, concurrent schedules, stimulus control, schedule control, pento barbital, rats
Added: February, 07th 2010
Posted by: shinta
File size: 202.10kb
Downloaded: 0
View as HTML
Eight rats were trained to discriminate pentobarbital from saline under a concurrent variable-interval
(VI) VI schedule, on which responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital were
reinforced under VI 20 s and responses on the saline-biased lever were reinforced under VI 80 s.
After saline, the reinforcement contingencies programmed on the two levers were reversed. The rats
made 62.3% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever after pentobarbital and 72.2% on
the saline-biased lever after saline, both of which are lower than predicted by the matching law.
When the schedule was changed to concurrent VI 50 s VI 50 s for test sessions with saline and the
training dose of pentobarbital, responding on the pentobarbital-biased lever after the training dose
of pentobarbital and on the saline-biased lever after saline became nearly equal, even during the
first 2 min of the session, suggesting that the presence or absence of the training drug was exerting
minimal control over responding and making the determination of dose–effect relations of drugs
difficult to interpret. When the pentobarbital dose–response curve was determined under the con-
current VI 50-s VI 50-s schedule, responding was fairly evenly distributed on both levers for most
rats. Therefore, 6 additional rats were trained to respond under a concurrent VI 60-s VI 240-s sched-
ule. Under this schedule, the rats made 62.6% of their responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever
after pentobarbital and 73.5% of their responses on the saline-biased lever after saline, which also
is lower than the percentages predicted by perfect matching. When the schedule was changed to a
concurrent VI 150-s VI 150-s schedule for 5-min test sessions with additional drugs, the presence or
absence of pentobarbital continued to control responding in most rats, and it was possible to gen-
erate graded dose–response curves for pentobarbital and other drugs using the data from these 5-
min sessions. The dose–response curves generated under these conditions were similar to the dose–
response curves generated using other reinforcement schedules and other species.
URL:


HTML Code:


Forum Code:
download

Leave a Reply

Please login or signup to comment.

DRUG DISCRIMINATION: STIMULUS CONTROL DURING REPEATED TESTING IN EXTINCTION rating 0.00 from  voters
Rats were trained, under a two-lever drug-discrimination procedure, to respond differentially de- pending upon whether lorazepam (1.0 mg/kg) or no injection had been administered before the
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 07th 2010
STIMULUS CONTROL OF COCAINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION rating 0.00 from  voters
Environmental stimuli that set the occasion wherein drugs are acquired can ‘‘trigger’’ drug-related behavior. Investigating the stimulus control of drug self-administration in ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 07th 2010
DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER CONCURRENT VARIABLE-RATIO VARIABLE-RATIO SCHEDULES rating 0.00 from  voters
Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under concurrent variable- ratio (VR) VR schedules, in which responses on the pentobarbital-biased lever were ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 07th 2010
BEHAVIOR OF RATS UNDER FIXED CONSECUTIVE NUMBER SCHEDULES: EFFECTS OF DRUGS OF ABUSE rating 0.00 from  voters
Four rats responded under a simple fixed consecutive number schedule in which eight or more consecutive responses on the run lever, followed by a single response on the reinforcement lever,
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 08th 2010
EFFECTS OF MORPHINE ON TEMPORAL DISCRIMINATION AND COLOR MATCHING: GENERAL DISRUPTION OF STIMULUS CONTROL OR SELECTIVE EFFECTS ON TIMING? rating 0.00 from  voters
Discrepant effects of drugs on behavior maintained by temporal-discrimination procedures make conclusive statements about the neuropharmacological bases of timing difficult. The current ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 07th 2010
DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER TWO CONCURRENT FIXED-INTERVAL FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULES rating 0.00 from  voters
Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a two-key concur- rent fixed-interval (FI) 100-s FI 200-s schedule of food presentation, and later under a ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 07th 2010
DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER A CONCURRENT FIXED-RATIO FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULE rating 0.00 from  voters
Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a two-key concur- rent fixed-ratio 10 fixed-ratio 40 schedule of food presentation, in which the fixed-ratio ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 08th 2010
DRUG DISCRIMINATION UNDER A CONCURRENT FIXED-INTERVAL FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULE rating 0.00 from  voters
Pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a concurrent fixed- interval (FI) FI schedule of food presentation on which, after pentobarbital administration, ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 08th 2010
MATCHING UNDER NONINDEPENDENT VARIABLE-RATIO SCHEDULES OF DRUG REINFORCEMENT rating 0.00 from  voters
Response-contingent deliveries of oral pentobarbital maintained responding of 3 rhesus monkeys during daily 3-hr sessions. Deliveries of pentobarbital were arranged under nonindependent ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 08th 2010
EFFECTS OF COMPOUNDING DRUG-RELATED STIMULI: ESCALATION OF HEROIN SELF-ADMINISTRATION rating 0.00 from  voters
Previous experiments have demonstrated that presenting independently established discriminative stimuli in compound can substantially increase operant responding maintained by food ...
0 CommentshintaFebruary, 07th 2010