Global Warming Myth and Marxism

Edward F. Blick
Global Warming
Myth
and Marxism
How the U.N. and Marxist Economists Have
Used the Global Warming Myth to Wreck
World Economies
Edward F. Blick, Ph.D.
1

---

Global Warming Myth and Marxism
About the Author
Dr. Edward F. Blick holds a M.S. in Aeronautical Engineering, and a Ph.D. in
Engineering Science. He served as a U.S. Air Force weatherman from 1951 to
1954. He has also been a professor at the University of Oklahoma in the School
of Petroleum & Geological Engineering, the School of Meteorology, the College
of Medicine, and the School of Aerospace, Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering.
Dr. Blick has worked for Lockheed Missile and Space Co. and McDonnell Aircraft
Corp., and has consulted for several corporations and government agencies,
including NASA and the United States Air Force.
All Scripture quotaions are from the King James Version of the Holy Bible, unless otherwise
noted.
© 20 9 by Southwest Radio Church of the Air. All rights resrved. No part of this bok may be
reproduced in any man er whatsoevr without writen permision of the publisher, except
in the case of brief quotaions in articles and reviews. For more information, write South-
west Radio Minstries, P.O. Box 10 , Bethany, OK 730 8; call 1-80 -652-14 ; or e-mail w w.
swrc.om.
Printed in the United States of America
2

---

Edward F. Blick
Global Warming Myth Used
by U.N. and Marxists to Wreck
World Economies
Summary
United Nations politicians, while admitting their lack of evidence, gave
birth and nurtured the fraud of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).
Their Malthusian purpose is to frighten people into accepting the U.N.
as the “centerpiece of democratic global governance” and let the U.N.
ration our fossil fuel. World temperature records show no evidence of
AGW (Fig. 9). Solar ctivty inthe twentieh century was extremely high.
Atmospheric CO2 levls rose asthe sa surface warmed (Fig. 4). Henry’s
Solubility Law, coupled with mass balances of carbon and its isotopes,
prove the total increase in atmospheric CO2 from pre–industrial times
is 2–4 percent. Burnig all our emain g fosil fuels, cannot double the
CO2, but only increase it by 20 percent. Beck (2007) cataloged 90,000
chemical measurements ofatmospheric CO2 inthe 180s, ome ashigh
as 470 ppm (parts per million) (greater than the current Mauna Loa
value of385 pm). Thes dat exposed asfalse the U.N IPC’s 280–pm
ice ore values, uposedly measured uring the 180s. IPC’s ice ore
measurements of CO2 were incorrect due to their inability to correct
3

---

Global Warming Myth and Marxism
for problems with gas solubility and the extreme pressures in glaciers.
God rules the climate, not manIntroduction
AGW is a hoax and has become the political agenda for the Democratic
Party and their environmental extremist supporters. There is no con-
vincing evidence for it. The originator of the AGW myth is the United
Nations. They have undiluted power todecive the public. They are law-
less, corrupt, anti–God, and an utter fraud. They are using the delusion
that man’s use of fossil fuels causes global warming in order to frighten
people into allowing them to rule the world, because any group that
controls carbon, controls the world. AGW isa hoax, religon, junk science,
and is worthless in its predictions of future global temperatures. It is
as scientific as astrology!
The U.N. and the Marxists
The source ofthis hoax ismportant. Everyone should be aware that he
AGW hoax was initiated and nurtured by the corrupt politicians of the
United Nations, the same people who colude with Sadam Husein to
skim billions of dollars in their “Oil for Food” scheme! AGW is environ-
mental extremism. Dr. Tim Ball, the distinguished former climatology
professor at the University of Winnipeg, has stated it is “possibly the
greatest deception in human history.” The nvironmental extremist aim
to destroy the industry western civilization. Many of these green Nazis
are misanthropic fanatics. Man is bad . polar bears are good! Limit
the number of people on the Earth! They will not be satisfied until we
are all living in a hut, defecating in a bucket, and cooking our food on
our dried dung.
After the 1989 fall of the Soviet Union, the Marxists, socialists, and
anti–capitalists wackos were looking for a new way to reinvent them-
4

---

Edward F. Blick
selves and find a new way to destroy America and western economies.
They found it in the evil U.N.’s contrived “man is destroying the planet
by burning fossil fuel religion.” This new religion of the socialists and
anti–consumerist opose large corporations, global fre trade, and eco-
nomic growth. They hate oil, coal, and gas companies. Thirty years ago
they, along with Jane Fonda and her movie China Syndrome, destroyed
nuclear energy in this country. At present we have a Marxist president
in our White House who shares many oftheir views. Our Marxist media,
who love to publish gloom and doom stories about global warming,
have joined hands with him.
Our president’s aversion to nuclear energy, and his vow to banish
coal, is frightening. Coal provides over 50 percent of our electricity.
Coal, oil, and natural gas built our modern economy during a fifty–year
period from 180 to 1930. During that period we went from horse
transportaion toplanes, trains, and automobiles. Carbon–based enrgy
has brought lower infant mortality, longer life xpectancy, run ing
water, electricity, astounding medical advances, and modern dentistry.
Socialst Maurice Strong isthe man behind the curtain the United
Nations, pulling the levers to use AGW as the vehicle to shift powers
away from individuals and sovereign nations to a small band of un-
accountable international elites. He has been the U.N. high priest of
environmentalism going as far back as U.N. Secretary General U Thant
(a Burmese Marxist). Maurice Strong has been involved in many U.N.
scandals, including the notrious Iraqi “Oil for Fod” program. In197,
while serving as advisor to Kofi Annan, he reportedly took a check for
almost $1 mil on from Sad am Husein’s U.N–sanctioned regime.
Strong is an enemy of our way of life. He is the mentor of Al Gore.
Strong and the U.N. set up the 1992 Rio de Janeiro conference en-
tiled “The Earth Sum it.” Itwas tende by Vice President AlGore. At
this conference Strong stated, “The Earth Summit will play an impor-
tant role in reforming and strengthening the U.N. as the centerpiece of
the emerging system of democratic global governance,” i.e. a one–world
5

---

Global Warming Myth and Marxism
government run by the U.N.
Maurice Strong and the U.N. set up the 1997 Kyoto conference on
global warming. All countries were urged to sign a treaty to reduce
their CO2 output in order to save the planet. China, India, and the U.S.
refused. Most of Europe joined, but have done little in the way of low-
ering their CO2 output. The National Review magazine, September 1,
1997, quoted Strong, “The only way of saving the world may be for
industrial civilization to collapse, deliberately seek poverty, and
set levels of mortality.” Futile attempts to control carbon by rationing
fossil fuel use by Western governments are exacerbating the present
world econmy, which isnow cirling around the drain. Timothy Wirth,
former U.S enator fom Colrado and president ofthe United Nation’s
Foundation stated, “We have to ride the theory of global warming
even if it is wrong.” Richard Benedict, former advisor to Kofi Annan
stated, “A global warming treaty must be implemented even if there
is no evidence of global warming.” These guys know AGW is not true,
and are deceiving the world by saying they are saving our planet.
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for
the urge to rule.
—H. L. Mencken
In 198, the corupt U.N politcians et up aphony scientifc panel caled
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPC). Its purpose was
to frighten people of AGW, and have them beg for a government solu-
tion. There was no scientific evidence then or now of any significant
AGW, sothey had tocreate amasterful ie. Sir John Houghton, the first
chairman of the U.N.’s IPCC stated, “Unless we announce disaster,
no one will listen”!
Here is how they succeeded. As a smoke screen, qualified experts
in science and climatolgy wer hired toinvestigate ifman has fected
the warming of the earth. Here is the summary the scientists wrote for
the 1995 IPCC Draft Report: 6

---

Edward F. Blick
1. None of the studies have shown any clear evidence of climate
changes due to greenhouse gases.
2. No study has positively attributed any climate change to an-
thropogenic causes.
3. Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change
are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the
total natural variability of the climate are reduced.
This was not what he U.N wanted! After the ral scientis droped off
their report, the U.N. politicians removed all three of the above quotes
and inserted the following bold–faced lie in the final 1995 IPCC Sum-
mary Report for lawmakers:
The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human
influence on global climate.
Because of this stab in the back lie, many of the IPCC scientists quit and
threatend the U.N with alwsuit norder tohave their names removed
from the IPCC final report.
The U.N. political appointees have adopted a strange and unusual
way of writing their IPCC reports. They first publish a summary report
for lawmakers. Then several months later they publish the scientific
report so as to assure its consistency with the previous summary re-
port. This politcal indoctrination, ot science! I’ve nevr known
of a science project where the summary is written first, and then the
scientific work is completed and reported later. After the 1995 IPCC
report, the lies, deceit, and sleight of hand were repeated in 2001 and
2007 IPCC reports.
Al Gore, the Chicken Little of Global Warming
Al Gore, the “Chicken Little” of global warming is a politician, not a
7

---

Global Warming Myth and Marxism
scientist. He made an “F” on his College Board physics exam and a “D”
in chemistry. He flunked out of Vanderbilt’s divinity school, with five
“F”s. He later transferred to Harvard and had only two college natural
science courses. He made a “D” in an evolution class, and a “C+” in the
other science course. With this acdemic background, oes anyone
really think he could have written two cleverly crafted science–fiction
books on global warming? Could Gore’s friends at the U.N. have ghost-
written those two books for Al? Gore ducks all challenges to debate on
AGW. Itis reported he collects $250,0 for his colorful “dog and pony”
show “on man’s destruction of the earth by [AGW].” Of course, he is a
hypocrite; his home reportedly uses over twenty times the amount of
electricity as an ordinary American home. To add insult to injury, Al
Gore was awarded a Nobel Prize. This prize should have come with
an engraved plaque of Proverbs 26:8, “Honoring a fool, is as foolish as
tying a stone to a slingshot.”
Dr. James Hansen: Fox Guarding the Hen House

Dr. James Hansen has ben AlGore’s global warming mentor for sevral
decades, and isa media darling depicted as no–partisan scientis. But
his immense arrogance is dwarfed by his great dishonesty. He is the di-
rector fNAS’s GIS lab that keps track ofglobal temperature. Sevral
prominent scientists have accused Hansen of cooking the temperature
books in order to make them appear to show that global warming has
ocured. Over 9,0 news tories have quoted his pro–global warming
lies. Recntly, Oklahoma senator James Inhofe “cleaned Hansen’s clock”
when he testified before Inhof’s Senate committee.
In 198 he apeared before Senator AlGore’s com ite and staed
he was 9 percent certain the arth was warming due toman’s burnig
of fossil fuels. He made a prediction to the senators about how much
the earth would warm up in the 1990s. His prediction was too high by
300 percent. In 2004, he publicly endorsed John Kerry for president,
8

---

Edward F. Blick
and then he received a $250,000 gift from the charity of Kerry’s wife,
Thersa Heinz. On June 23, 208, Hansen asked Congres toconvict Big
Oil eaders for the high crime ofdoubting lobal warming! Ina moment
of candor, he did admit he is willing to exaggerate science in order to
get public atention. InFebruary 209, Hansen equated coal with death.
Some responsible climatologists have called for his termination. With
the Marxist coup that took over our country on January 20, 2009, it is
doubtful that will happen, since our president is singing the same tune
as Hansen.
CO2: Gas of Life
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is the gas of life for plants, man, and animals.
All plant life is ustained by photsynthesi, wher CO2 plus water plus
the sun’s enrgy form carbohydrates plus oxygen. Humans and animals
breathe in oxygen and exhale CO2. It sounds like an intelligent design!
Many qualified climate scientists have noted the earth has been
cooling for the past ten years. Some are predicting this cooling effect
is due to periodic cycles of the solar output and may continue for many
decades. Ifthis hap ens, we are going to have ls land to produce
crops, since many millions of acres of land in the northern regions of
North America, Europe, and Asia will be too cold to farm. To improve
the productivity of the land that can be farmed we need as much CO2
in the atmosphere as possible. Yet some Green Nazis in our govern-
ment want to sequester CO2—that is, they want to take CO2 out of our
atmosphere and pump it into the ground! We have met the enemy, and
it is our governments, from the U.N. on down to our national, state, and
local levels. The Green Nazis have gained a lot of power since our 2008
November election!
If atmospheric CO2 falls to 220 ppm, plants get sick. They die at
160 ppm. In a field of corn on a sunny day, unless wind currents stir
up the air, all of the CO2 is consumed within one meter of the ground in
9

---

Global Warming Myth and Marxism
five minutes (Source: personal com unication with Daryl Smika, Plant
Physiologist, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture). In order to increase their yield,
commercial greenhouse owners increase the CO2 levels to 600–1,000
pm. Acording tohe Mauna Loa Observatory, the presnt amospheric
CO2 is about 385 ppm, but in times past it was as high as 2450 ppm.
(Jaworoski, 1992a, 1992b).
Evidence Against Global Warming
The hotest years for America in the twentieh century wer in the
1930s (Fig.1). Twenty–four states had their high temperature records
set in the 1930s. Only seventeen had their temperature records set in
last fifty years of the twentieth century! Where is the fingerprint of
“AGW”? Loking athes dat, how can any reasonable person belive it?
During the twentieth century the Earth warmed up about 0.6° C.
The warming correlated with the great increase in solar activity (Fig.
2). Simlarly, astronmers noted that Jupiter, Mars, Saturn, Neptune, and
Pluto all warmed up in the twentieth century (Archibald, 2008). Since
1998, global warming has taken a vacation. We’ve had global cooling
from a lazy sun with its reduced sun spot activity (Archibald, 2008).
We’ve al sen the CO2 bubles rise out ofa glas ofa cola drink asit
warms after taken out ofthe rfrigerator. Simlarly the oceans “breathe”
carbon dioxide in and out with its cooling or heating by the sun. CO2
is less soluble in water as it warms and more soluble as it cools. The
warming during the twentieth century caused the oceans to emit more
CO2 into the atmosphere (Endersbee, 2008, Fig. 4).
Since the late 180s, aminscule amount of atmospheric global
heating of ½ W/m2 was due to an increase of 2–4 percent of atmo-
spheric CO2, due to the burni g fosil fuels (Segalstad, 19 6). This
corresponds to a tiny 0.05° C rise in temperature, using the climate
sensitivity parameter of 0.1° C per W/m2 (Kiehl and Trenberth, 1997).
This climate snsitvity parmetr of0.1° Cper W/m2 agres with eight
10

---