In a reply to R. Ratcliff and G. McKoon's (1995a) article on bias in the object decision task, D. L.
Schacter and L. A. Cooper (1995) critiqued their theoretical arguments and presented an updated
view of priming in the object decision task. In the present article, the updated view is examined in
detail, and it is questioned whether Schacter and Cooper's explanation of the data is sufficiently
articulated to be falsifiable. It is also argued in the present article that evidence from other research
domains is not directly supportive of the memory systems hypothesis and that the statistical power
available in data from object decision experiments is not great enough to test some relevant
hypotheses. Finally, the bias hypothesis (Ratcliff & McKoon, 1995a) is elaborated to show that it
requires a particular pattern of experimental results and that it serves as a target phenomenon for
Occur to be on this page because you are looking into livesmart360 and taking into consideration if this is the suitable enterprise small business for you to join. Nicely, you have come to the best ...