This is not the document you are looking for? Use the search form below to find more!

Report home > Education

Lexical-Functional Grammar

0.00 (0 votes)
Document Description
Lexical-Functional Grammar Lecture 1: Motivations for LFG by Stephen Wechsler University of Texas at Austin. A Power Point Report.
File Details
Submitter
  • Name: jayden
Embed Code:

Add New Comment




Related Documents

Lexical Functional Grammar

by: angus, 21 pages

The term Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) first appeared in print in the 1982 volume edited by Joan Bresnan: The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, the culmination of many years of ...

LEXICAL-FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR OF THE CROATIAN LANGUAGE: THEORETICAL ...

by: minna, 10 pages

Formal description aims to find the most suitable way to formalize a certain segment of the language, or some language phenomena at morphological, lexical, syntactic or semantic level. There is a ...

Parsing the Wall Street Journal usinga Lexical-Functional Grammar ...

by: christian, 8 pages

We present a stochastic parsing system consisting of a Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG), a constraint-based parser and a stochastic disambiguation model. We report on the results of applying this ...

PARSING TURKISH USING THE LEXICAL FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR FORMALISM

by: lyyli, 7 pages

This paper describes our work on parsing Turkish using the lexical-functional grammar formalism. This work represents the first effort for parsing Turkish. Our implementation is based on Tomita's ...

Japanese Parser on the basis of the Lexical-Functional Grammar

by: regina, 12 pages

We report a Japanese parsing system with a linguistically fine-grained grammar based on the Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) formalism. The system is the first Japanese LFG parser with over 97% ...

Computational Complexity and Lexical-Functional Grammar

by: mersada, 13 pages

The main result of this paper is to show that certain Lexical-Functional Grammars can generate languages whose recognition time is very likely computationally intractable, at least according to ...

Lexical Functional Grammar

by: sylwester, 66 pages

LFG assumes two different ways of representing syntactic structure, the constituent structure or c-structure and the functional structure or f-structure. These two structures constitute two ...

Toward Integrating Lexical-Functional Grammar into Algebraic ...

by: mufida, 26 pages

Algebraic approach[Rus02]to translation provides us a profound mathematical view to translating from one language to another, such as from programming language to machine code (compiler), from a ...

The Role of the Lexicon in Lexical-Functional Grammar - Example on ...

by: heikki, 6 pages

The LFG model is based on an enriched lexicon, which contains associations between grammatical functions and their arguments, enabling decomposition on characteristic features and is suitable for ...

Converting the Penn Treebankto Systemic Functional Grammar

by: armas, 8 pages

Systemic functional linguistics offers a grammar that is semantically organized, so that salient grammatical choices are made explicit. This paper describes the explication of these choices through ...

Content Preview


Lexical-Functional Grammar
Lecture 1: Motivations for LFG

Stephen Wechsler
University of Texas at Austin





Overview

• Psycholinguistic roots of LFG

• Nonconfigurationality

• Movement Paradoxes

• (Lexicalism— next time)

Chomsky’s (1965) competence hypothesis


The competence model should be a component of a
larger model of language use:

‘When we say that a sentence has a certain derivation with
respect to a particular generative grammar, we say nothing about
how the speaker or hearer might proceed, in some practical or
efficient way, to construct such as derivation. These questions
belong to the theory of language use–– the theory of
performance. No doubt, a reasonable model of language use will
incorporate, as a basic component, the generative grammar that
expresses the speaker-hearer’s knowledge of the language; but
this generative grammar does not, in itself, prescribe the
character or functioning of a perceptual model or a model of
speech production.’ (Chomsky 1965:9)


What sort of competence model can be embedded in a
successful model of language use?

2 important results of early psycholinguistic studies
(summarized in Fodor, Bever, and Garrett 1974):

constituent structure is psychological y real

• there is no evidence that transformations are
psychological y real

Sentences purported to result from the application of
transformations are not harder or more time-consuming
to process than transformation-less sentences.

Responses to this challenge for transformations:

(i) Reject the competence hypothesis; instead,
language use involves agrammatical strategies (Fodor,
Bever, and Garrett 1974). Problem: If these strategies
violate postulates of UG, then what is UG a theory of?

(i ) Ignore the empirical evidence and abandon the
attempt to unify results from theoretical syntax and
psycholinguistic studies
. (Chomsky 1980, p. 191ff)

(i i) Abandon transformations and attempt to develop a
competence model which is consistent with what we
know about language processing. LFG and HPSG grew
out of this third response.


The mental ‘processor’ must assign appropriate
grammatical relations and thematic roles to strings of
words: who did what to whom?

The active/passive alternation.
active:
Mary has kissed the frog.
passive: The frog was kissed (by Mary).

Transformation to derive passive (NP-movement):
S
S
==>
NP
Aux
VP
NP
Aux
VP
was
V
NP
PP
was
the frog
V
NP
PP
kissed
the frog by Mary
kissed
by Mary
e




Instead of a passive transformation, LFG posits active
and passive verb lexical entries with different mappings
between theta-roles and grammatical functions. The
realizations of grammatical functions are constant for a
given language (SUBJ is the NP daughter of S in English,
etc.). A lexical rule explains the regularity of passive.

kiss (active):

SUBJ=kisser, OBJ=kissee



=> (lexical rule)

kissed (passive):
SUBJ=kissee, (OBLby=kisser)

Lexical vs. syntactic rule: why it matters

transformational rule: output trees of A-movement are
infinitely many (John’s frog was kissed by Mary; John’s
mother’s frog was kissed by Mary
; etc.) Hence these
trees are not stored in the mind. To decode the thematic
roles, the processor must perform operations specified by
transformations, resulting in greater derivational
complexity (which was disconfirmed).

lexical rule: captures a pattern over a finite domain,
namely the lexicon. Indeed, lexical rules have been
replaced by a non-derivational model for lexical
alternations (Lexical Mapping Theory; cp. Bresnan and
Kanerva 1989).

Nonconfigurationality (Bresnan 2001, ch. 1)

Morphology competes with syntax

‘across languages, there often appears to be an inverse
relation between the amount of grammatical information
expressed by words and the amount expressed by
phrases.’ p. 6.

How are Grammatical Relations signaled?

• English: by phrase structure

• Warlpiri: by morphology (case, agreement)



S
English


S

qp

(SUBJ) =
=

NP
VP
qpqp
two small children Aux
=

|
VP

are
ei

V
(OBJ) =

|
NP

chasingei

D
N


|
|


that
dog

Review question: Give empirical evidence for this
constituent structure.
E.g. show that the word string chasing that dog is a
constituent, while the string chasing that is not.

Download
Lexical-Functional Grammar

 

 

Your download will begin in a moment.
If it doesn't, click here to try again.

Share Lexical-Functional Grammar to:

Insert your wordpress URL:

example:

http://myblog.wordpress.com/
or
http://myblog.com/

Share Lexical-Functional Grammar as:

From:

To:

Share Lexical-Functional Grammar.

Enter two words as shown below. If you cannot read the words, click the refresh icon.

loading

Share Lexical-Functional Grammar as:

Copy html code above and paste to your web page.

loading