Personality Traits
Running head: PERSONALITY TRAITS OF BUS DRIVERS
Personality Traits of Bus Drivers conducive to maintaining
good student behavior
S. Brent Depee‟
May, 2009
A dissertation submitted to the Education Faculty of
Lindenwood University in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the
degree of
Doctor of Education
School of Education
UMI Number: 3372325
Copyright 2009 by
Depee, S. Brent
All rights reserved
INFORMATION TO USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy
submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and
photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper
alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
______________________________________________________________
UMI Microform 3372325
Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
_______________________________________________________________
ProQuest LLC
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to the following people for their unconditional
love and support that they have shown me through this
journey in my life. I first want to thank my wife, Whitney,
for all the sacrifices she made while I have attempted to
further my education. I want to thank my children,
Mackenzie, Dalton, and Dayne for understanding why I was
gone so much from home. I want to thank my parents, Kent
and Donna, for their continued support and for the example
they both set for my brother, sister, and me. I am forever
grateful to them for being such good role models and
emphasizing the importance of God, family, and education. I
want to especially thank my mother for paving the way for
my life in education and my sister-in-law, Sherry, for her
help in this study.
This study is a continuation of my specialist project
that was completed at Southwest Baptist University in 2006.
I want to give special thanks to Dr. Robert Perry for his
help with the statistical aspects of this study.
ii
ABSTRACT
School administrators are faced with the responsibility of
disciplining students for misconduct on the school bus.
Some bus drivers frequently send discipline referrals to
the administration, whereas others seldom do. This study
attempts to identify certain personality traits of bus
drivers that contribute to good student behaviors. Bus
drivers from rural Missouri school districts who drove
regular school routes were given the Global 5 Personality
Trait Test. Building principals from these rural school
districts gathered bus discipline referrals for the first
semester of the 2008-2009 school year. The research design
is quantitative causal-comparative in nature, while the
data was collected and analyzed with the use of multiple t-
tests and the Pearson r. No significant differences between
the personality traits of drivers with numerous discipline
referrals were found compared to the drivers with minimal
bus discipline referrals.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES.............................................x
CHAPTER ONE-INTRODUCTION...................................1
Background of the Problem.............................1
Theoretical Underpinnings.............................2
Statement of the Problem..............................4
Rationale for the Study..........................5
Independent Variables............................7
Dependent Variables..............................7
Statement of Hypothesis...............................7
Null hypothesis..................................7
Alternative hypothesis...........................8
Limitations...........................................8
Delimitations.........................................9
Summary..............................................10
CHAPTER TWO – REVIEW OF LITERATURE........................11
Background of the Study..............................11
Review of Literature.................................11
Historical aspects of Personality Trait Tests...12
Carl Jung..................................12
Myers-Briggs...............................13
Francis Galton.............................14
Alfred Binet...............................16
iv
Raymond Cattell............................19
Hans Eysenck...............................23
Gordon Allport.............................24
Big Five Personality Trait Test......................26
Personnel and Discipline.............................32
Personality Traits and Student Behavior..............37
Personality Traits and Decision Making...............38
Personality Traits and Job Performances..............42
Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance...........47
Personality and Stressful Situations.................62
Requirements of Bus Drivers..........................65
What are the Experts looking for?....................67
Summary..............................................69
CHAPTER THREE – METHODOLOGY...............................72
Introduction.........................................72
Subjects.............................................74
Sampling Procedure...................................75
Research Setting.....................................76
Research Design......................................85
Instrumentation......................................86
Validity of Instrument...............................87
Reliability of the Instrumentation...................87
Validity of the Study................................87
v
Reliability of the Study.............................88
Statistical Treatment of the Data....................88
Rationale for Selected Statistical Treatment.........88
Explanation of Data Treatment for Variables..........88
Summary..............................................89
CHAPTER FOUR – RESULTS....................................90
Introduction.........................................90
Results..............................................90
Analysis of Data.....................................96
Deductive Conclusions................................96
Null hypothesis.................................96
Alternative hypothesis..........................97
Summary..............................................97
CHAPTER FIVE – DISCUSSION.................................98
Introduction.........................................98
Implications for Schools.............................99
Recommendations.....................................100
Summary.............................................101
REFERENCES..........................................103
VITA................................................128
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Big Five Theory Dimension.......................29
Table 2. Student Ethnic Composition......................76
Table 3. Student Characteristics.........................78
Table 4. Where Graduates Go..............................79
Table 5. Expenditures per child and ACT Scores...........80
Table 6. Population Basis................................81
Table 7. Workforce by Occupation.........................82
Table 8. Family measures of income.......................82
Table 9. Poverty.........................................83
Table 10. Descriptive Statistics for driver referrals.....90
Table 11. Drivers two or more SD from the mean............93
Table 12. Drivers one SD from mean........................93
Table 13. t-test (p>.05)for the Global 5..................94
Table 14. Crosstabs comparing referrals to traits.........95
vii
Add New Comment