RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR: A Life History Perspective 2nd Special Abridged Edition
Professor J. Philippe Rushton University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2
2 Acclaim for J. Philippe Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavior
“(An) incendiary thesis....that separate races of human beings evolved different reproductive strategies to cope with
different environments and that these strategies led to physical differences in brain size and hence in intelligence.
Human beings who evolved in the warm but highly unpredictable environment of Africa adopted a strategy of high
reproduction, while human beings who migrated to the hostile cold of Europe and northern Asia took to producing
fewer children but nurturing them more carefully.”
---Malcolm W. Browne, New York Times Book Review
“Rushton is a serious scholar who has assembled serious data. Consider just one example: brain size. The empirical
reality, verified by numerous modern studies, including several based on magnetic resonance imaging, is that a
significant and substantial relationship does exist between brain size and measured intelligence after body size is
taken into account and that the races do have different distributions of brain size.”
---Charles Murray, Afterword to The Bell Curve
“Describes hundreds of studies worldwide that show a consistent pattern of human racial differences in such
characteristics as intelligence, brain size, genital size, strength of sex drive, reproductive potency, industriousness,
sociability, and rule following. On each of these variables, the groups are aligned in the order: Orientals, Caucasians,
---Mark Snyderman, National Review
“Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavio
r...is an attempt to understand [race] differences in terms of life-history
evolution....Perhaps there ultimately will be some serious contribution from the traditional smoke-and-mirrors social
science treatment of IQ, but for now Rushton’s framework is essentially the only game in town.”
---Henry Harpending, Evolutionary Anthropology
“This brilliant book is the most impressive theory-based study...of the psychological and behavioral differences
between the major racial groups that I have encountered in the world literature on this subject.”
---Arthur R. Jensen, University of California, Berkeley
“The only acceptable explanation of race differences in behavior allowed in public discourse is an entirely
environmental one...Professor Rushton deserves our gratitude for having the courage to declare that ‘this emperor
has no clothes,’ and that a more satisfactory explanation must be sought.”
---Thomas J. Bouchard, Jr., University of Minnesota
“The remarkable resistance to racial science in our times has led to comparisons with the inquisition of Rome, active
during the Renaissance.... Astronomy and the physical sciences had their Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo a few
centuries ago; society and the welfare of humanity is the better for it today. In a directly analogous fashion,
psychology and the social sciences today have their Darwin, Galton, and Rushton.”
---Glayde Whitney, Contemporary Psychology
“The data are startling to the uninitiated....Race, Evolution, and Behavior
confronts us as few books have with the
dilemmas wrought in a democratic society by individual and group differences in key human traits.”
---Linda Gottfredson, Politics and the Life Sciences
“Professor Rushton is widely known and respected for the unusual combination of rigour and originality in his
work....Few concerned with understanding the problems associated with race can afford to disregard this storehouse
of well-integrated information which gives rise to a remarkable synthesis.”
---Hans J. Eysenck, University of London
“Should, if there is any justice, receive a Nobel Prize.”
---Richard Lynn, Spectator.
3 Race, Evolution, and Behavior:
A Life History Perspective
2nd Special Abridged Edition
J. Philippe Rushton
Race, Evolution, and Behavior
2nd Special Abridged Edition
Copyright @ 2000 by J. Philippe Rushton
All rights reserved.
Published by the Charles Darwin Research Institute
Port Huron, MI
1st (1995) and 2nd (1997) Unabridged editions published
by Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
Japanese translation of 1st edition published by
Hakuhin-sha of Tokyo (1996).
1st Special Abridged Edition published
by Transaction Publishers (1999).
Library of Congress Card Number: 00-103721
Printed in the United States of America
Rushton, J. Philippe, 1943-
Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History
Perspective/J. Philippe Rushton. — 2nd spec. ab. ed.
[GN 281:4.R87 2000].
J. Philippe Rushton is a professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario,
London, Ontario, Canada. Rushton holds two doctorates from the University of London (Ph.D.
and D.Sc) and is a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, the American Association
for the Advancement of Science, and the American, British, and Canadian Psychological
Associations. He is also a member of the Behavior Genetics Association, the Human Behavior
and Evolution Society, and the Society for Neuroscience. Rushton has published six books and
nearly 200 articles. In 1992 the Institute for Scientific Information ranked him the 22nd most
published psychologist and the 11th most cited. Professor Rushton is listed in Who’s Who in
Science and Technology, Who’s Who in International Authors, and Who’s Who in Canada.
1. Race is More Than Skin Deep
2. Maturation, Crime, and Parenting
3. Sex, Hormones, and AIDS
4. Intelligence and Brain Size
5. Genes, Environment, or Both?
6. Life History Theory
7. Out of Africa
8. Questions and Answers
6 Preface to 2nd Special Abridged Edition
The first printing of this Special Abridged Edition appeared in 1999 by Transaction Publishers. It
followed up on their successful 1995 and 1997 publications of the1st and 2nd unabridged editions and a
Japanese translation published by Hakuhin-sha in 1996.
However, when Transaction distributed thousands of copies of the Special Abridged Edition in a
mass mailing to academics, a firestorm of controversy engulfed them. Although the Abridged Edition
presented the same research in a condensed and popularly written style, similar to that used for articles in Discover Magazine, Reader’s Digest,
and Scientific American,
the Progressive Sociologists, and some
other self-styled “anti-racists,” threatened Transaction with loss of a booth at annual meetings, advertising
space in journals, and access to mailing lists if they continued to send it out.
Transaction caved in to this pressure, withdrew from publishing the book, and even apologized.
Transaction’s letter of apology appeared on the inside front cover of their flagship journal Society
(January/February, 2000). Accounts of the affair appeared in The Chronicle of Higher Education
14, 2000), Canada’s National Post
(January 31, 2000), the National Report
(February 28, 2000), and
Why the attempt to trash or suppress this booklet? Because there is no stronger taboo today than
talking about race. In many cases, just being accused of “racism” can get you fired. Yet, teachers in
America know the races differ in school achievement; policemen know the races differ in crime rates;
social workers know the races differ in rates of welfare dependency or getting infected with AIDS. And
sports fans know that Blacks excel at boxing, basketball, and running. They all wonder why. Some
blame poverty, White racism, and the legacy of slavery. Although many doubt that “White racism” really
tells the whole story, few dare share their doubts. When it comes to race, do you really dare to say what
Racial groups differ much more widely than many people realize. Yet vocal groups in academia
and the media simply forbid letting the public in on an open discussion. Many worry that just mentioning
that the races differ creates stereotypes and limits opportunities. But looking at race does not mean
ignoring individuals. It may even help us become more aware of each person’s special needs.
This book presents the scientific evidence that race is a biological reality that has both scientific
and everyday meaning. Other recent books on the issue are: The Bell Curve
(the 1994 best seller by
Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray), Why Race Matters
(a 1997 book by philosopher Michael Levin), The g Factor
(a 1998 book by psychologist Arthur Jensen), and TABOO: Why Black Athletes Dominate
Sports and Why We Are Afraid to Talk About It
(a recent book by award winning journalist Jon
For more detailed information on any of the topics in this Special Abridged Edition, please read
the corresponding sections in one of the unabridged editions, which contain over 1,000 references to the
scholarly literature, a glossary, complete name and subject indexes, and 65 tables and figures. You can
also point and click to the www.charlesdarwinresearch.org which published this booklet for more
Department of Psychology
University of Western Ontario,
London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2..
7 1 Race Is More Than Skin Deep Is race real? Do the races differ in behavior as well as in body? Are such views just the result of white racism? Modern science shows a three-way pattern of race differences in both physical traits and behavior. On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains
and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the other pole. Whites fall in the middle, but closer to Orientals than to Blacks.
White men can't jump. Asian men can’t either. But according to Jon Entine’s new book, Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We Are Afraid to Talk About It,
Black men — and women
— sure can. The usual reason given for Black athletic success is that Blacks have little chance to get
ahead elsewhere. But Entine’s new book shows that in sports, Blacks have a genetic edge.
The physical facts Entine reviews are quite well known. Compared to Whites, Blacks have
narrower hips which gives them a more efficient stride. They have a shorter sitting height which provides
a higher center of gravity and a better balance. They have wider shoulders, less body fat, and more
muscle. Their muscles include
more fast twitch muscles which produce power. Blacks have from 3 to
19% more of the sex hormone testosterone than Whites or East Asians. The testosterone translates
into more explosive energy.
Entine points out that these physical advantages give Blacks the edge in sports like boxing,
basketball, football, and sprinting. However, some of these race differences pose a problem for Black
swimmers. Heavier skeletons and smaller chest cavities limit their performance.
Race differences show up early in life. Black babies are born a week earlier than White babies,
yet they are more mature as measured by bone development. By age five or six, Black children excel in
the dash, the long jump, and the high jump, all of which require a short burst of power. By the teenage
years, Blacks have faster reflexes, as in the famous knee-jerk response.
East Asians run even less well than Whites. The same narrow hips, longer legs, more muscle, and
more testosterone that give Blacks an advantage over Whites, give Whites an advantage over East Asians.
But admitting these genetic race differences in sports leads to the greater taboo area — race differences in
brain size and crime. That is why it is taboo to even say that Blacks are better at many sports.
The reason why Whites and East Asians have wider hips than Blacks, and so make poorer runners
is because they give birth to larger brained babies. During evolution, increasing cranial size meant women
had to have a wider pelvis. Further, the hormones that give Blacks an edge at sports makes them restless
in school and prone to crime.
Race in History
Even before there were any intelligence tests, philosophers, statesmen, merchants, and others
thought there was a link between race, intelligence, and cultural achievement. Aristotle, Plato, Voltaire,
and David Hume all believed this. So did Broca, Darwin, Galton, and all the founders of evolution and
anthropology. Even Freud believed in some race differences. But this began to change in the 1920s with
Franz Boas and James B. Watson, who believed that culture could change just about anything. Today,
writers like Jared Diamond in Guns, Germs and Steel
(1997) and S. J. Gould in The Mismeasure of Man
(1996) tell us there is no link between race, intelligence, and culture. The differences we see are all just
because of bad luck or White racism.
The first explorers in East Africa wrote that they were shocked by the nudity, paganism,
cannibalism, and poverty of the natives. Some claimed Blacks had the nature "of wild animals... most of
them go naked... the child does not know his father, and they eat people." Another claimed they had a
natural sense of rhythm so that if a Black "were to fall from heaven to earth he would beat time as he goes
down." A few even wrote books and made paintings of Africans with over-sized sex organs.
Sound familiar? All just a reflection of racism? Maybe so, but these examples are not from 19th
Century European colonialists or KKK hate literature. They come from the Muslim Arabs who first
entered Black Africa over 1,200 years ago (in the 700s), as detailed in Bernard Lewis’s 1990 book, Race
and Slavery in the Middle East.
Several hundred years later, European explorers had the same impressions. They wrote that
Africans seemed to have a very low intelligence and few words to express complex thoughts. They
praised some tribes for making fine pottery, forging iron, carving wooden art, and making musical
instruments. But more often, they were shocked by the near nakedness of the people, their poor sanitary
habits, simple houses, and small villages. They found no wheels for making pots, grinding corn, or for
transport, no farm animals, no writing, no money, and no numbering systems.
The Whites who explored China were just as racist as those who explored Africa, but their
descriptions were different from what they and the Arabs had written about Africans. In 1275 Marco Polo
arrived in China from his native Italy to open trade with the Mongol Empire. He found that the Chinese
had well built roads, bridges, cities connected by canals, census takers, markets, standardized weights and
measures, and not only coins, but paper money as well. Even a postal system was in existence. All of
these made him marvel when he compared the Chinese to what he saw in Europe and the Middle East.
Even though he was an Italian, proud of his people and well aware of the greatness of Ancient Rome,
Marco Polo wrote: "Surely there is no more intelligent race on earth than the Chinese."
Historical research bears out Marco Polo’s impressions. As early as 360 B.C., the Chinese used
the cross bow and changed the face of warfare. Around 200-100 B.C., the Chinese used written exams to
choose people for the civil service, two thousand years before
Britain. The Chinese used printing about
800 A.D., some 600 years before Europe saw Gutenberg’s first Bible. Paper money was used in China in
1300, but not in Europe until the 19th and 20th centuries. By 1050 Chinese chemists had made
gunpowder, hand grenades, fire arrows, and rockets of oil and poison gas. By 1100, factories in China
with 40,000 workers were making rockets. Flame throwers, guns, and cannons were used in China by the
13th century, about 100 years before Europe.
The Chinese used the magnetic compass as early as the 1st century. It is not found in European
records until 1190. In 1422, seventy years before Columbus’s three small ships crossed the Atlantic, the
Chinese reached the east coast of Africa. They came in a great fleet of 65 ocean going ships filled with
27,000 soldiers and their horses, and a year’s supply of grain, meat, and wine. With their gunpowder
weapons, navigation, accurate maps and magnetic compasses, the Chinese could easily have gone around
the tip of Africa and “discovered” Europe!
In the last five centuries, the European nations leapfrogged over the Chinese in science and
technology. Since 1950, however, Japan has beaten the West in the production of many high-tech
products. Other Pacific Rim countries (China, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea) now follow Japan’s
path. Africa, on the other hand, has fallen further behind. The poor conditions of African countries and
Black America have become a concern to many. Much of the optimism of the U.S. Civil Rights
movement of the 1960s is gone, along with the high hopes for independent African
nations. Trillions of
dollars of foreign aid have poured into Africa. Yet African economies have declined since the Europeans
Neglect and decay are seen everywhere in Africa and much of the West Indies. International
corporations often have to provide their own power, their own water, and their own phones. In the age of
computers, fax machines, and the world wide web, getting a dial tone in many African cities is difficult.
9 Race in Today’s World
For the past twenty years I have studied race differences in brain size, intelligence, sexuality,
personality, growth rate, life span, crime, and family stability. On all of these traits, Orientals fall at one
end of the spectrum, Blacks fall at the other end, and Whites fall in between.
Chart 1 lists the differences between the three major races: Orientals
(East Asians, Mongoloids), Whites
(Europeans, Caucasoids), and Blacks
(Africans, Negroids). To keep things simple, I will use these
common names instead of scientific ones and will not discuss subgroups within the races.
On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, and less sexually active, have larger
brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the opposite end in each of these areas. Whites fall in the
middle, often close to Orientals. The evidence shows that this is due to both
genes and environment. I
have suggested an evolutionary theory to explain this three-way pattern.
Of course, these differences are average
s. The full range of behaviors, good and bad, is found in
every race. No group has a monopoly on virtue or vice, wisdom or folly. However, this pattern is true
over time and across nations and this means that we cannot ignore it.
10 Plan of the Book
This chapter briefly describes the 3-way pattern of race differences. The following chapters
provide more detail.
Many statistics in Chart 1 come from the United States, where Orientals are a “model minority.”
They have fewer divorces, fewer out-of-wedlock births, and fewer reports of child abuse than Whites.
More Orientals graduate from college and fewer go to prison.
On the other hand Blacks are 12% of the American population and make up 50% of the prison
population. In the U.S., one out of every three Black men is either in jail, on probation, or awaiting trial.
That is much more than the number who graduate from college.
Chapter 2 shows how this racial pattern in crime is found worldwide. INTERPOL Yearbooks
show the rate of violent crime (murder, rape, and serious assault) is four times lower in Asian and Pacific
Rim countries than in African and Caribbean countries. Whites in the United States and in European
countries are intermediate. The 1996 INTERPOL violent crime rates clearly show this pattern: Asian
countries, 35 violent crimes per 100,000
people; European countries, 42; and African countries,
Chapter 2 also finds that Oriental children are slower to mature than White children while Black
children are faster to mature. This is true for the rate of bone and tooth development and the age at which
a child first sits, crawls, walks, and puts on clothing. Oriental children do not begin to walk until about 13
months, White children at 12 months, and Black children at 11 months.
Chapter 3 looks at racial differences in sexual activity. Orientals are the least sexually active,
whether measured by age of first intercourse, intercourse frequency, or number of sexual partners. Blacks
are the most active on all of these. Once again Whites are in between. These contrasts in sexual activity
lead to differences in the rate of diseases like syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes, and chlamydia. There are high
levels of AIDS in Africa, Black America, and the Caribbean and low levels in China and Japan. European
countries again fall in between.
The races differ in rate of ovulation (Chapter 3). Not all women produce one egg during the
menstrual cycle. When two or more eggs are produced at the same time, a pregnancy is more likely. So is
the likelihood of producing fraternal twins (i.e., two-egg twins). The number of twins born is 16 out of
every 1,000 births for Blacks, 8 out of every 1,000 births for Whites, and 4 or less for Orientals. Triplets
and other multiple births are rarest in Orientals and highest in Blacks, with Whites in between.
Chapter 4 is about race and intelligence. Hundreds of studies on millions of people show a three-
way pattern. IQ tests are often made to have an average score of 100, with
a “normal” range from 85 to
115. Whites average from 100 to 103. Orientals in Asia and the U.S. tend to have higher scores, about
106, even though IQ tests were made for use in the Euro-American culture. Blacks in the U.S., the
Caribbean, Britain, Canada, and in Africa average lower IQs -- about 85. The lowest average IQs are
found for sub-Saharan Africans -- from 70 to 75.
Chapter 4 also looks at brain size. Bigger brains have more brain cells and this leads to higher
IQs. The races vary in brain size. The Collaborative Perinatal Project followed more than 35,000 children
from birth to seven years. Orientals had larger brains than Whites at birth, four months, one year, and
seven years. Whites had larger brains than Blacks at all ages (see Chart 2). The data on adults in Chart 2
come from a sample of 6,325 U.S. Army personnel.
Chapter 5 asks whether differences in our brain size, our bodies and our behavior are because of
genes, environment, or both. It also asks whether individual differences can tell us anything about race
- A Life History Perspective
- Professor J. Philippe Rushton
- Race Is More Than Skin Deep
- Race in History
- Race in Todays World
- Plan of the Book
- Personality, Aggression, and Self-Esteem
- Parenting and Out-of-Wedlock Births
- Longevity and Population Growth
- Additional Readings
- Sexual Behavior and Attitudes
- Sexual Physiology and Anatomy
- AIDS and HIV
- Intelligence and Brain Size
- Race Differences in Brain Size
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Brain Weight at Autopsy
- Measuring Skull Size
- Summarizing Brain Size Differences
- Genes, Environment, or Both?
- Heritability Studies
- Adoption Studies
- Race and Heritability
- Trans-racial Adoption Studies
- Heritabilities Predict Racial Differences
- Regression to the Average
- Testosterone -- The Master Switch?
- The latest theory of human origins -- Out-of-
- The Evidence
- Geography and Race
- Closing Thoughts